District:
Author:

Performance



AYP REPORTS


Click to print this report
Click to print this report
Print




AYP REPORT

CAPITAL CITY PCS - UPPER SCHOOL



Year
: 2011
Group
: PUBLIC CHARTER
Subject
:
READING ()
Category
: SECONDARY


MET AYP?
Acad. Target
Safe Harbor
NO
NO



GROUP
2010
%
PROFICIENT
READING, 2011(‡)
Number
in Group
Number
Tested
%
Tested
%
Proficient
Met
% Tested
(95%)
Met Prof.
Target (1)
(71.79%)
Safe
Harbor (2)
ETHNICITY
Asian/Pacific Islanders*
-
11
-
-
-
-
-
-
Black/Non-hispanic
52.17%
65
65
100.00%
52.31%
Yes
No
No
Hispanic
53.23%
80
80
100.00%
55.70%
Yes
No
No
White/Non-hispanic*
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
GENDER (3)
Female
52.00%
86
86
100.00%
60.47%
-
-
-
Male
57.14%
74
74
100.00%
53.42%
-
-
-
SPECIAL EDUCATION (4)
Disabled (5)
-
34
34
-
30.30%
-
No
No
ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Lep/Nep*
38.89%
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
ECONOMIC STATUS
Econ. Disadvantaged
51.14%
123
123
100.00%
54.92%
Yes
No
No
MIGRANT STATUS (3)
Migrant*
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
54.03%
160
160
100.00%
57.23%
YES
NO
NO





*
No data are displayed for groups with less than 25 students.
(‡)
As of 2011, the Met Prof. Target and Safe Harbor AYP determinations for subgroups includes Math / Reading proficiency results only. The total MET AYP? flag includes proficiency, participation in testing, and attendance/graduation.
(1)
AYP reading target = 71.79%, AYP math target = 70.27%.
(2)
Safe Harbor is achieved if a group that does not meet the proficiency target in the current year has at least 95% tested and reduces the percent not proficient from the previous year by 10%. In 2006 the reduction in percent not proficient has been adjusted because of the difference in proficiency standards on the DC-CAS and the SAT9.
(3)
Females, males, and migrants are not subject to AYP targets.
(4)
This group includes at least one student who exited special education services in the past two years. These exited special education students are included in the proficiency rate for the students with disabilities subgroup, provided there are at least 25 students currently receiving special education services. These students are not included in the participation rate.
(5)
This group includes at least one student who took the alternate assessment.


ATTENDANCE RATE AT CAPITAL CITY UPPER SCHOOL=96.1%PERCENT
Analysis Paragraph: